Friday, December 24, 2010

Before And After Jaw Implants

Stephen Hawking's Universe: Between Science and Faith

Stephen Hawking's Universe: between science and faith.


The universe requires a Creator? According to the famous British mathematician and astrophysicist Stephen Hawking, no "may have created the universe by itself, may have been created from nothing" and therefore "God did not create it." As Darwin seemed to disprove the existence of God with his theory of biological evolution of our species, Hawking wants to deny it now from the point of view of physics. In his most famous book "From the Big Bang to the hole blacks", the astrophysicist had tried to explain what happened "before" the Big Bang, or the time before he was born, leaving the question unresolved. But in his new work, entitled "The Grand Design" (The big project), written together with American physicist Leonard Mlodinow, the scientist gives the answer: instead of being an unlikely event, be explained only by divine intervention, the Big Bang was "an inevitable consequence of the laws of physics. " Hawking says: "Since there is a law like gravity, the universe and may have been created by myself, from scratch. The spontaneous creation is the reason why there is something instead of nothing, why there 's universe, why we exist. " In the book, the researcher also predicts that physics is close to formulate a "theory of everything", a series of equations that can fully explain the properties of nature. 'S useless, therefore, "call upon God to let him touch the sky and let him load the spring mechanism of the universe."
If the great astrophysicist Hawking reminded a bit of classical philosophy, understand that the real problem is not the explanation of the origin of the universe and of life, but its meaning .
Humans who have the "light of reason", they ask what is the meaning of the Universe, and Everything as there is not nothing, because there are life and death, good and evil . They wonder, then, just because of evil men.
Stephen Hawking is forced to live on a wheelchair and is completely paralyzed: he speaks only through the technology. But medical science does not say never because he himself was hit by evil. Perhaps Hawking, like the biblical character Job, have asked God why hurt a right. In this latest work "The Great Project," Hawking recalls the discovery in 1992 of a planet orbiting a star similar to Earth around the Sun, which confirms, in his opinion, that if land is not unique. Now, considering that it is highly likely that not only there are other planets like Earth but also others (and perhaps infinite) universe, Hawking asks: If God had wanted to create the universe in order to create the man (or intelligent beings, even if spread to other planets in other galaxies or universes), what sense would add all the rest? This is the point: what is the meaning Universe, man? Scientific research seeks to "avoid" annoying, scientifically inappropriate meaning. But as long as man exists who has the "light of reason" would not give to question the meaning of life and death, evil and beauty.
We now try to reconcile the scientific reasoning with that of pure faith come to understand that we can not do without an intervention of a divine plan to ensure that the Universe acquires meaning.
In recent centuries, astronomers were scanning the sky with telescopes noticed rudimentary formations nebulous, indistinct contours. They thought they were gas clouds close to us. But in the '20s, with the entry into operation of the largest and most powerful telescopes, it was discovered that these "gas" was something much more vast and interesting galaxies.
Galaxies are huge clusters of stars, gas and other substances that rotate around a central core. Take for example the galaxy in which we live, the Milky Way. Our solar system, namely the Sun, Earth and other planets with their moons, belongs to this galaxy. But it was only a microscopic part, because our galaxy, the Milky Way, contains more than 100 billion stars! According to some scientists, this number should be at least 200-400 billion stars. (Imagine the number of stars for each of the billions of galaxies that exist ...) The diameter of our galaxy is such that, traveling at the speed of light (about 300,000 km per second), it would take 100,000 years to cross it! Our galaxy, therefore, has a diameter of about 960 million billion kilometers! It seems that the average distance between stars in the galaxy is approximately 6 light-years, or about 58 trillion km But of our galaxy is only the beginning of what is in space! Have been identified so many galaxies that are considered "are common as the grass in a meadow." Can be found in the observable universe about 10 billion galaxies! But there are many others that are beyond the reach of current telescopes. Some astronomers estimate that the universe there are at least 100 billion galaxies, each galaxy and can hold hundreds of billions of stars! These massive galaxies are usually arranged grouped in "clusters" defined as the berries in a cluster of grapes. Some clusters contain a relatively small number of galaxies. Other clusters of galaxies are made up of tens, hundreds or even thousands of galaxies. The average distance between galaxies within a cluster can be up to about 1 million light years. But the distance between a cluster of galaxies and the other can be a hundred times greater. And there is even reason to think that the clusters themselves are arranged into "superclusters," like grapes on a vine. What immense proportions and wonderful organization!
Coming to our Solar System, is another splendid example of an organization. The Sun, which is a medium size star, is the "core" around which the second well-defined orbits the Earth and other planets with their moons. Year after year, rotating with a mathematical precision that astronomers can accurately predict where will at any future time.
Looking at the infinitely small, we find the same accuracy. The atom is a marvel of perfection very similar to the order of the solar system. It consists of a nucleus in which there are particles called protons and neutrons, surrounded by a "cloud" of orbiting electrons. All matter is made of these building blocks for construction. What makes a substance differ on the other is the amount of protons and neutrons in the nucleus and the quantity and arrangement of electrons that go around. All this with an order so perfect that all the constituent elements of matter can be arranged in regular succession according to the number "brick" of which they are composed.
The size of the universe are truly stunning and the same goes for the wonderful way in which it is organized. Infinitely large to the infinitely small, from clusters of galaxies to atoms, to which the vibrating strings with each vibration frequency then corresponds to a given matter particle (fermion, like electron, proton and the neutron) or force (boson, like the photon, the graviton or gluon), the universe is characterized by a superb organization. Former astronaut John Glenn mentioned the "order of the entire universe" and the fact that the galaxies' travel in predetermined orbits to one another. " After of that said, "It can be done entirely by chance, by a stroke of luck? E 'was an accidental event that a collection of flotsam has suddenly begun to establish these orbits on its own initiative?" Glenn concluded: "I can not believe it ... Some" force "must have put all this in orbit and keeps it there." In fact the universe is arranged with such precision that humans can rely on celestial bodies to calculate the time. But any precision timing is obviously the work of a systematic mind have the capacity to design. A systematic mind can design can not exist if not an intelligent being. What about the structure and precision much more complexity that characterizes the entire universe? This also does not indicate the existence of a Designer, a manufacturer of a Mind of an Intelligence? An organization requires an extraordinary Extraordinary Organizing. All experience teaches us that everything must have had organized an organizer. Each machine, computer, building, or even a pencil or a piece of paper, is the product of a builder, an organizer. The far more complex and amazing organization Universe should logically have also requested an organizer.
addition, the entire universe, from galaxies to the vibrating strings, is governed by precise laws physical . To put into orbit a rocket needs to respect the laws of motion and gravity. These laws require a lawgiver. The immense proportions, the precision and the laws that exist throughout the universe would never have occurred by chance, all these things can be attributed to a higher mind.
The universal laws governing matter exists. But where did the matter ? In his book Cosmos, Carl Sagan said: "At the beginning of the universe there were no galaxies, stars or planets, life, or civilizations." Sagan calls the "transition" from the current universe was "the most impressive transformation of mass and energy We had the privilege of seeing. "Here is the" key "to understanding how the Universe may have come into existence: there must have been a" transformation of energy and matter . "This relationship was demonstrated by Einstein's famous formula , E = mc ^ 2 (energy equals mass to the speed of light squared) and very recently by the report that provides in-Nardelli Palumbo corriaspondenza two-way action of the bosonic string and the superstring, then the bosons, ie from ' energy, have created the fermions, namely the mass, and vice versa. Einstein's formula shows, inter alia, that the matter can be obtained from the energy, as well as the matter can produce an enormous amount energy. Astrophysicist Josip Kleczek says: "Most and possibly all of the elementary particles can be created by materialization of energy." Scientific evidence indicates, therefore, a source of unlimited energy would actually hold the raw material to create the "essence" of the Universe. The prophet Isaiah in the Bible points out that this source of energy is living with an intelligence personality, saying: "Lift up your eyes and see: who created those stars? He points out in their army and the exact number calls them all by name; to his omnipotence and the strength of his force not missing any "(this with reference to property or heavenly bodies). Then, from biblical point of view, behind the event described in Genesis 1:1, that is: "In the beginning God created Heaven and Earth", there was this unlimited energy source.
Typically scientists today recognize that the universe indeed had a beginning. Among the main theories that seek to explain this is the beginning of the so-called "Big Bang" (big explosion), that, according to almost all cosmologists, it was really the moment of Creation. But, as recognized by astrophysicist John Gribbin, although scientists "prevail in the vast majority can describe in detail" what happened after that "moment", what determines "the moment of creation remains a mystery. "
A simple" explosion "can not therefore have created our universe with its majestic structure its laws and its order overtime. only a powerful organizer and legislator could" drive "the powerful forces at work so that this causes such wonderful organization and laws. The scientific evidence and the reason therefore provide a solid biblical support for the following statement: "The heavens declare the glory of God and proclaims His handiwork firmament. "- Psalm 19:2
Another thing that should make us reflect inherent in the Big Bang is as follows. The original Big Bang was far from symmetrical. At time of creation there was a small symmetry breaking between matter and antimatter that brought the first to dominate the second and made possible the existence of the universe around us. If the universe was born from "nothing", certainly this "nothing" was not completely empty but was in itself a small dose of "broken symmetry" which led to the current prevalence of matter over antimatter. The origin of this "broken symmetry" has not yet been understood by science, but if we reflect for a moment easily understand the great intelligence that is behind this "break" and that allowed the universe to evolve as we see and we know.
Regarding the "creative nothing", even the physical Gabici states: " The "quantum mechanics", in fact, and in particular the "uncertainty principle" of Heisenberg, admits the appearance of anything from small amounts of energy (referred to as "fluctuations") and therefore also our universe may be born by a fluctuation, which is still an admit a kind of 'fiat lux'. The only "hole" in the cosmological explanation, is the length of time that goes zero to an estimated time From the instant in "less than 10 to 43. Yet in that range has been the birth of our universe. We call it "creation"? And what was first? Nothing. But this "nothing" it is nothing or something more complex? Obviously must be something more complex if it is true that nothing can occur from these "fluctuations '." I believe that "nothing", the "string perturbative vacuum" and "intelligent" and intelligence is that Cosmic from then identified with the Creator of the Universe. But because the universe originated, because there is "everything" instead of "nothing"?
Beautiful and also to reflect these verses taken from the Book of Sirach (Bible) 42 :22-25 " How lovely is all His works! And how sparkling they are to see. All these things live and remain forever in all circumstances and all obey him. All are in pairs, facing each other (matter and antimatter, particle and antiparticle, positive and negative, black hole and white hole, good and evil, etc. ...), He has made nothing incomplete. This confirms the merits of the other, who shall be satisfied in contemplating His glory? "
conclude this article with the following statement:" The because of the creation of the universe resides in an act of pure love from the Creator. As each of us is born of an act of love, God who is without attributes, and that is Father and Mother, created the Universe and the wonderful story of the Cosmos by an act of love which then results in the intelligence Design .
Michele Nardelli


Tuesday, December 14, 2010

A C Program To Create A Calculator

On Some equations Concerning quantum electrodynamics coupled to quantum gravity: Mathematical connections with Some sector of Strings and Number Theory

This is the title and summary of the new article on the connections between Mathematics, Number Theory, Quantum Gravity and sectors of string theory and


On Some equations Concerning quantum electrodynamics coupled to quantum gravity, the gravitational contributions to the gauge couplings and quantum effects in the theory of gravitation: Some Mathematical connections with Sector of String Theory and Number Theory


Abstract


This paper is principally a review, a thesis, of principal results obtained from various authoritative theoretical physicists and mathematicians in some sectors of theoretical physics and mathematics. In this paper in the Section 1 , we have described some equations concerning the quantum electrodynamics coupled to quantum gravity. In the Section 2, we have described some equations concerning the gravitational contributions to the running of gauge couplings. In the Section 3 , we have described some equations concerning some quantum effects in the theory of gravitation. In the Section 4 , we have described some equations concerning the supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory applied in string theory and some lemmas and equations concerning various gauge fields in any non-trivial quantum field theory for the pure Yang-Mills Lagrangian. Furthermore, in conclusion, in the Section 5 , we have described various possible mathematical connections between the argument above mentioned and some sectors of Number Theory and String Theory, principally with some equations concerning the Ramanujan’s modular equations that are related to the physical vibrations of the bosonic strings and of the superstrings, some Ramanujan’s Identities Concerning the π and zeta strings.


For those who want to read the full article, below the links:

http://nardelli.xoom.it/virgiliowizard/sites/default/files/sp_wizard/docs/NarTom1.pdf

http://eprints.bice.rm.cnr.it/3088/1/NarTom1.pdf

http://eprints.bice.rm.cnr.it/3088/



Michele Nardelli

Saturday, November 13, 2010

What Can Cause The Lip To Swell

Lebesgue integral, Chern-Simons theory, Yang-Mills theory and string theory

On the Lebesgue integral and the Lebesgue measure: Mathematical Applications in Some Sectors of Chern-Simons gauge theory and Yang-Mills Theory and Mathematical Some Sectors of connections with String Theory and Number Theory
Abstract
In this paper, in the Section 1 , we have described some equations and theorems concerning the Lebesgue integral and the Lebesgue measure. In the Section 2 , we have described the possible mathematical applications, of Lebesgue integration, in some equations concerning various sectors of Chern-Simons theory and Yang-Mills gauge theory, precisely the two dimensional quantum Yang-Mills theory. In conclusion, in the Section 3 , we have described also the possible mathematical connections with some sectors of String Theory and Number Theory, principally with some equations Concerning the Ramanujan's modular equations That Are related to the physical vibrations of the bosonic strings and of the Superstrings, Some Ramanujan's identities and π Concerning the zeta strings.
As can be seen from the title and dall'Abstract, this is an article that "connects" the Lebesgue integral, some mathematical aspects of the theory of the Chern-Simons and Yang-Mills in turn closely related to strings.
For those interested in the study of the full version in English, you can click on the link below:

http://eprints.bice.rm.cnr.it/3068/1/NarLeb1.pdf


Michele Nardelli

Thursday, October 28, 2010

Wisdom Teeth Pain Worse At Night

On Some Mathematical equations Concerning the functions z (s) and z (s, w) and Some Ramanujan-type series for 1/pigreco


On Some Mathematical equations Concerning the functions z (s) and z (s, w) and Some Ramanujan-type series for 1/pigreco. Mathematical equations Concerning Some connections with the p-adic open string for the scalar tachyon field and the zeta strings.
This is my last work on the connections between string theory and number theory. Below the abstract and link to the article published on the Database of Physics and Number Theory Prof. Watkins, who wanted to read in full.

Abstract

In this paper, in the Section 1, we have described some equations concerning the functions z (s) and z (s,w). In this Section, we have described also some equations concerning a transformation formula involving the gamma and Riemann zeta functions of Ramanujan. Furthermore, we have described also some mathematical connections with various theorems concerning the incomplete elliptic integrals described in the “Ramanujan’s lost notebook”. In the Section 2, we have descrive some Ramanujan-type series for 1/pigreco and some equations concerning the p-adic open string for the scalar tachyon field. In this Section, we have described also some possible and interesting mathematical connections with some Ramanujan’s Theorems, contained in the first letter of Ramanujan to G. H. Hardy. In the Section 3, we have described some equations concerning the zeta strings and the zeta nonlocal scalar fields. In conclusion, in the Section 4, we have showed some possible mathematical connections between the arguments above mentioned, the Palumbo-Nardelli model and the Ramanujan’s modular equations that are related to the physical vibrations of the bosonic strings and of the superstrings.
Link:
Michele Nardelli

Wednesday, October 27, 2010

Allusions Said By Juliet In Romeo And Juliet

Parking in Sondrio, the ASM is called acting out

After 12 years, Sondrio says goodbye to ASM management of municipal parking areas. From 1 January will be to take care of Aipa less than 1,000 cars - 718 of 255 underground and surface - as it already does for other Italian cities. The company so far has dealt with in the capital of billboard advertising, has participated and won the tender announced by Praetorian Palace, with a bid of € 570 thousand compared to a minimum starting price set at € 400 thousand, with many of the requirements quality specified in the notice (video surveillance, alarm panels, rather than pay for the post below ground level).
envelopes of tenders - five in all those sent to Praetorian Palace - were opened yesterday. And the surprise is among them was that there was not that of ASM. The Multiservice was called off in advance by the management of the service which dealt with since 1998 and which still occupies the private underground car park in Piazza Garibaldi. "It's a conscious decision and unanimously by the Board," explained the President of the Multiservice Nicholas Giugni. "The board could decide not to consider the analysis of the structure - still Giugni - if it had considered the strategic choice to win the service. But it is not so. "

Monday, September 6, 2010

How Long Do Cojibas Last In Box

What was there before the Planck time? A possible origin of the Universe and Unified Theory on the Unification of Forces.

(From Grishka and Igor Bogdanov, "before the Big Bang-The Origin of the Universe" - Ed Longanesi - 2008)

Part Two

The gravitational instanton is a singular point: the size is zero, does not occupy any volume in space, nor any point in time. The solution of Einstein's equations, calculated by Friedmann, led inevitably to the existence of this singularity. This is true even taking into account the limits of fluctuation raging at the Planck scale? The fluctuations of the temporal direction must lead to the existence of a singular point of origin. The mathematical object that describes the fluctuation of the time at the Planck scale is merely the product of two groups of symmetries that correspond to the two possible signatures of the metric: the Lorentz group [symmetry group of space-time that SO writes (3.1)] and the Euclidean group [group corresponding to a 4-space dimensions that evolves into imaginary time and write SO (4)]. The next step is to build the unification of these two groups in a symmetric homogeneous space completely describes the fluctuation of the signature between real time and imaginary time. As a topological space, the space in five dimensions which allows the fluctuation of time has the topology of a convex cone. And as we know, involves a cone vertex, which represents a singular source, a Ground Zero. Hence the result that the fluctuations of the metric signature inevitably refer to the existence of a zero point, the singularity at the origin of space-time. The KMS condition for the spacetime at the Planck scale, provides that, at this scale, a scale in which the temporal direction is not fixed but "floating" the universe is in a state of thermal equilibrium. The singularity at the origin that is not has substance (and existence) any physical level. Being outside of space, time and energy, this is a pure geometric abstraction. Like us to do the math, we can conceive of this word "point" as a pure image of the "zero", which has the same simple ideal. At the same time, on the other hand, possesses all the wealth and all the complexity. Beyond dell'istantone gravitational singular, there is nothing. Neither matter nor space nor time. All that remains is the lonely, silent, motionless initial singularity, the zero point, an entity wholly mathematics, legible and visible only through mathematics. What we see at Ground Zero? What kind of landscape we've come? We are in a new realm: that of mathematical entities. Here, everything changes, we can become as small as we want. Let us assume, therefore, be smaller than 10 or 10 ^ 1000 ^ 10000. In fact, we fall into an endless infinite power with negative exponent, ie towards zero. The series of prime numbers calculated so far of nearly three million digit for the decimal point of π, now if they know more than a hundred billion. And the great number theorists are convinced that the hearts of those interminable series, in the billions of digits that are lost in the infinite, there is a secret, a key, opening the gates of infinity, it makes us fall to zero. So the origin of the universe. Zero Point time but there does not exist in its real form: it, like we said before, is imaginary. This means that the evolution of the system will not be more real, as in our world, but imaginary, as in the information world. When we explore the quantum world, we were on the surface of the sphere. Now we are always on the surface, but the ball has undergone three spectacular change. The first change is that it is continuously deformed by the quantum storm. The second change is that its internal is no longer the same. Because the direction of time that it has ceased to be contained "complex" to become a line of pure imaginary time, that is a new real line: a fourth dimension of space. The third change that is disappearing, the line of time has not only made our ball completely "static", but it has also removed the scale. Now, since we can walk into what previously was a volume, it is no longer a sphere but a bubble, a bubble closed with a "board", and the edge is simply the sphere S3. This time, though its interior is "full" is the fourth dimension of the bubble. The latter, despite its four dimensions, has no size defined: it is impossible to determine what measures. Seen with our eyes, is nothing but a "point": that of Friedmann, Hawking. But seen from there, the point becomes a bubble of radius limit. Among other things, the bubble is equivalent to a foam, conversely, when the bubble "collapses" to a point, gives rise to a point with four dimensions. Inside the bubble singular, we are in a "bouquet of spheres," an unlimited series which starts from zero and goes to infinity. Now, on each edge of each bubble, there is information, a certain state, a picture of the universe. It is as if we were inside a soap bubble, with his feet on the south pole of the bubble. Then you will see an infinite number of bubbles in transparent, with each of the images on the surface. On a side note, the picture is slightly different to infinity. In this research, was used as a mathematical tool, a "partition function". On a zero, the function "falls" on a topological invariant, which is just 1. This figure tells us that at time zero, the universe is necessarily reduced to a point. But since this is topologically the same thing as a bubble, this means that our invariant "rolls out" all the balls as possible from zero to infinity. This is what in statistical mechanics we define "excitation of all possible states of the system." Here, all states are unique blister on his board, ie on the infinite number of spheres. And so, from our point Zero see the whole universe. Each ball contains an image property. Yet, if we pass from one sphere to another, from one image to another, here everything is in motion, it evolves: an evolution in imaginary time. It is clear then, as all bubbles up to infinity are equivalent to zero, that everything is encoded in the zero. Just as in mathematics, the Lorentz symmetry group (the one that describes our space-time) is the extended form of the symmetry group of compact, Euclidean, which governs the transformations of the sphere, the spacetime in its dynamic is nothing but the extended the original shape of the bubble. To reach our zero-point, we had to cross three very different worlds from each other, from our world, what we are used and in which we live, we went down to the Planck scale to discover a very different universe, an environment chaotic quantum torn by the storm, where the notion of "distance between points, ie the metric becomes complex. Finally, the scale of 0 we have entered a universe in Euclidean spaces: the quantum storm has ceased, and that world is apparently calm. Property forever as a photo, a film projected image after image to infinity, an infinite number of screens on gradually larger. A film that contains all the images at the same time. Take a DVD containing a movie, the true contents of the disc can not be reduced finally to information? This information will become readable and interpretable only when it will be decoded in time and order, by the reader (and us). So, the story of the film will become comprehensible to us only when we will start watching the movie at the end. But what about this "story" when, after seeing the movie, remove the disc from the player? Curiously, it is always "there", which is stored on disk, with its scenes, the characters and situations. But it's just pure information, global, outside of time, outside time: the whole story and the DVD from start to finish, in its entirety, but its evolution, its transformations, can only be in a purely imaginary time. Therefore, the information does not depend either on time or space: it is outside of our physical reality. It does not take even a certain volume of space, so as it does not take a certain period in time. Already several decades ago, they began to understand the relationship seemed to exist between the entropy (degree of order of a system) and information of this system. And it was found that one is the inverse of the other: the more entropy is low (the entropy is a measure of disorder in the system), plus the information contained in the system is high. Returning to the DVD, this is only visible and consistent with the degree of order information that composes it, and that is contained on the disk. There is a close relationship between the laws of information, those and the entropy of thermodynamics. The report is easy to understand: in the life of every day, every minute, we transform energy into information. In other words, we transform real time (energy) in imaginary time (information). What we call information can not, strictly speaking, exist only in an imaginary time. More exactly: thus, according to the laws of thermodynamics, the entropy of a system exists in real time, information that characterizes the system that exists in imaginary time. While the real time leads, with the energy and entropy, the transformation of a system, the imaginary time by his door, with an entropy nothing, its information system. We may hold information, we can pass it, multiply it to infinity, and it does not evolve: it is essentially invariant (ie, outside of real time). To cross the real time is always the same information, which really does exist in a purely imaginary time. In math, we will say that information is a topological invariant. What we call imaginary energy (which by definition is static, as it exists in an imaginary time) can be considered equivalent to information. Erwin Schrodinger, asked: where does the universe? How can we understand life? To respond, the great physicist was based on an absolutely fundamental principle: the second law of thermodynamics. It argues that in a closed system (as is the case the universe), what we call entropy can only increase. The entropy measures the amount of uncertainty that characterize a system: the more uncertainty is higher, the entropy is large. If we say that the universe entropy (disorder) is increasing, it means that the zero must be zero. To understand why the zero entropy vanishes, one has to "stretch" the second law of thermodynamics in complex time. The famous Schrodinger wave equation is exactly the same invented a century before by Joseph Fourier, who bears the intriguing name of the heat equation. The latter describes the diffusion of heat into space while the Schrodinger equation (similar to it in minute detail) shows the evolution of what he calls the wave function of a quantum phenomenon. Compare these two equations we see, to our great interest and wonder, that the heat equation is nothing but the Schrodinger equation, but written in imaginary time (and not in real time). On the basis of their common points, was made a sort of synthesis of these two equations. In doing so, it was possible to reformulate the problem of evolution of spacetime at the Planck scale. And in this new framework, the most important discovery about the value zero at time zero entropy. Beyond the Planck scale, the time is no longer real but complex (meaning that real time is necessary to add an imaginary time). What has happened since the second law? It must simply be reformulated in complex time. Begin by considering the new form taken by entropy when it is described in complex time. What do we see? In essence, two things: one concerns the origin of the universe, the other end in his future far away. About the origin, we have previously said that the zero-scale real-time disappears, and there is only one pure imaginary time: an invariant (ie, an integer) we can put as equal to unity, ie 1. The entropy equation is then reduced to the simple form of the logarithm of 1, namely zero. How to interpret this result? Of course, as follows: at time zero, the entropy of the space-time is nothing. And consequently, the information that characterizes the pre-space-time is infinite, because the information should be considered as the inverse - more precisely, the dual - entropy. We can find the same result in reverse thinking: what happens when the entropy becomes nothing? The extended equation immediately provides the solution: real-time needs to be replaced by an invariant, namely the pure imaginary time. The conclusion to be drawn from this is that the zero space-time emerging in a state of perfect order, was nothing more than pure information, immersed in imaginary time. And for the distant future? Certainly the world will not escape the inexorable degradation. However, in that era the entropy is not unimaginable infinity. In fact, once the last atom of matter evaporated (must pass a number of years equal to 10 raised to the billionth power) changes will be accomplished, leading to its end. This means that real time will become extinct along with that last atom. The moment the last moment will vanish in eternity, along with that last atom lost in the infinite, the entropy will again be zero. It will reappear at the same time, in all its fullness, the imaginary time. In fact, from the time when a variable is fixed to become a pure state, a topological invariant, then it ceases to evolve that state can be described only in imaginary time: it becomes a pure information. If we consider the light cone, the cone is the space-time, and outside it, the so-called "Elsewhere", which unfolds in the imaginary time. In this future in which energy and matter no longer exist, there is more light and, consequently, there is no longer the "cone" Elsewhere there is only crossed by the flow from zero to infinity of the topological imaginary time. Such is the fate of our universe: it was the other side of the imaginary time in the form of readable information in an equation (the index of singularity), that's all evolution has led him to rediscover the end of time, bottom unfathomable to a cycle, the same invariant, that information that pure soft light that gives life and meaning to the Being that overlooks nothing. In Einstein's relativity, there is a four-vector. This allows us to describe the difference between the energy of a system (which depends on the time) and its relativistic time (which comes from the spatial coordinates). When the speed of the system "than" the speed of light (as occurs at the Planck scale), the energy signature changes and becomes imaginary (and enters the Euclidean metric). In this case, the four-vector of Einstein is not a physical object, but a topological object, sheer quantity of information. It "lives" in imaginary time and energy is imaginary. It is in this sense that the information must be understood as real imaginary energy. What is the relationship between the singularity and all that precedes it? Simply that the zero-scale, ie the point, the entropy is zero. In this limit entropy 0, the system can present, simultaneously, all possible states. Entropy nothing corresponds to a distance scale anything to the system, entropy ovverossia point. And it corresponds well with what we might call "topological excitation of all possible states of the point." In other words, entropy nothing is equivalent to infinite information. "The zero entropy describes all possible states that can be defined for a system, however, regardless of the laws of thermodynamics." The zero entropy, therefore, can not be a property of a real system. This is an extraordinarily powerful property, which applies to those who are called "ideal systems, ie systems whose time evolution is pure imaginary. So, in its own evolution, the whole universe is a huge system that transforms energy into information. At zero scale, the universe is just information: it has no size, does not occupy any space and its Evolution does not happen in real time, but in imaginary time. Throughout the "period" cosmological place between the zero-scale and the Planck scale (ie between time zero and the Planck time), the pre-universe does not undergo any real change made parametric by real-time evolves, simply, complex time. It's just far beyond the scale zero, ie the Planck scale, the evolution ceases to be imaginary, oscillates in the complex plane and becomes real in that moment, and only then, begins the Big Bang "physical". And with it, the real-time. From then on, the information "global" that prevailed at time zero, knowing only the imaginary time, the information contained "whole story" of the universe, from its birth up to the unfathomable future, enter the time, it becomes "local" in the real world and it was subjected to long development that will allow the physical universe to find, little by little, over the billions of years, the complexity of the original beginnings. Since the Planck scale all physical fields (curvature, temperature, energy density) of the pre-space-time tends to infinity, it is possible to consider the structure of the initial singularity in terms of topological invariants. This research allows us to highlight the origin of the pre-space-time, the existence of a topological index (ie an invariant) which has been called the "singularity invariant". It is a kind of formula that "encodes" the three fundamental symmetries relied upon when the universe was still a simple mathematical point. This formula can be read as: "trace (- 1) ^ s = 1. The "s" represents the "figure metric", ie the different possible states of the metric of space-time, while the trace is the sum of (AC) on all metrics. We see that the topological limit, the sum of all possible states of the metric reduces to the number 1. This number is what is called a topological index, which shows exactly the shape of the universe at time zero. This index is defined by mathematicians "Euler characteristic". Number 1 is the characteristic of the point and, more generally, of a bubble. Consequently, at time zero, the bubble that represents the pre-spacetime to 4 dimensions has zero radius. What's more, that point is the source of a "current topology such that the bubble radius zero is subject to expansion from zero to infinity. This is, in the very early stage non-physical expansion of our universe before the Big Bang. Finally, the topological invariant is essential that describes the three symmetries existing at Ground Zero: the symmetry between time and space, the symmetry between the real and imaginary, and finally, the symmetry between zero and infinity. The so-called "transition TF (ie topological transition from the physical state) can be explained in terms of" splitting "beyond the Planck scale, among the" current topology (which is a pseudo-evolution of the pre pure-universe in imaginary time) and the physical flow (which describes the evolution in real time). It's an evolution that, in an area, does not maintain the "rules" - the length or scale - of what space. It was thus proposed that the space corresponding to a Euclidean metric is necessarily subjected to an "expansion" of its rule, in other words that they obey a transformation "not uniform" corresponds to an evolution in imaginary time (which is also called " Euclidean evolution "). Based on this idea, it was proposed that the breakup of the KMS state "by the (pre-) space-time beyond the Planck scale is such that the supersymmetry breaking on the same scale. This approach is essentially "dynamic" to the supersymmetry breaking in the sense that, as points out the famous mathematician Alain Connes, von Neumann algebras are objects fundamentally "dynamic". You can show how the mathematical equation representing the equilibrium state of a system is in fact strictly equivalent to a new equation, which describes the evolution of the same system in imaginary time. To summarize: the solution "topological" the singularity implies that the zero-scale pre-space-time interaction was bent on a "point" with Euclidean metric. At this point, accessible only through the theory of topological fields, you can see that the signature of the metric is positive definite, in other words, the coordinate time is generally purely imaginary, ie behaves exactly like a fourth dimension of space. We are now going to describe the relationship between zero and infinity. First you say: it contains zero to infinity, in the same way the initial singularity contains the entire universe. We note that the zero and infinity are linked by a very strange relationship. If you divide a number by infinity, you will get zero on the other hand, multiplying any number by zero, you will never achieve a result different from zero. The same applies to the infinite, by taking a random number (very small), and multiplying it by infinity, you will get the infinite. We will say the following reports: n / ∞ = 0, n × 0 = 0, n × ∞ = ∞. In short, what you can clearly see that the zero is in some way, is the dual of the infinite. Another "thing" where we find mathematical relations between zero and infinity is the "Riemann sphere." The genius mathematician Riemann showed that adding a point at infinity "in excess of a complex plan" that same plan is transformed into a sphere. The origin (zero) is thus the south pole of the Riemann sphere and the North Pole is, quite simply, the infinite. By studying more closely the ball, you come quickly to remark: not only zero has a relationship with the infinite, but in a sense, seems to generate. Even in the rational numbers (fractional), we find the connection between zero and infinity. The rational numbers extending from zero to infinity on the real line. The most interesting thing about these numbers is that "the number of rational is zero." They do not occupy any space on the real line because we can always be found, along with a number as small, a number even smaller. And adding all those numbers, the series that is formed shall, as a result, zero. What is the limit of a series of numbers that become progressively smaller, ad infinitum? Is zero. In mathematical language, we say that rational numbers form what is termed a "dense set" even if the entire line of rational numbers is saturated, strangely, they do not occupy any space (or rather, they occupy only the zero). We know that the zero-scale, the universe has no more physical content, has a purely mathematical content. Because the Zero is a mathematical object, its "evolution" is also math. The only way to describe this "dynamic of the Point Zero" is changed then only the use of mathematical methods. Singular state (represented by the point source) has no reason to evolve by itself. There is necessarily a mathematical engine. The secret of the early evolution possible, the secret of the Big Bang exploded freezing cold to Planck's Wall and beyond, that code both primordial and final, we'll find it at zero. So the zero is in duality relation with the infinite and has the strange power to generate it. How can 'something' - in fact, an infinite - spring from nowhere? The great mathematician George Cantor "felt" that consists of all those infinite numbers conceivable that one came from a source, a number nothing that focused all the mysteries: zero. The zero has the power to generate the number 1. Since we have only zero, and nothing else, the only operation that will be achievable: raising zero to the only available power: this power is necessarily zero. The theory shows that zero raised to the power zero is equal to one. We can achieve the same result by calculating what mathematicians call the factorial of zero. The factorial of an integer is simply the product of positive integers less than or equal to the number given. As in the case of zero leads to an "empty product", for construction, the factorial of zero (which is written to 0!) Is equal to 1. Zero can generate all numbers, whether real or pure imaginary. Let's see how. Consider just the symbol purer than zero, which in set theory is "the empty set." The empty set is equal to zero, by construction. The empty set is defined as "all original". In mathematical terms, it is said that the cardinality (ie the total) of the empty set is nothing original. So we have the empty set and zero, which is equal to the empty set. We have zero inside of the empty set: our set is not empty, contains zero or one element. The cardinality of is not zero, but one. Take the number 1 thus created and place it next to zero, in that group which was initially empty. But this means that together, now, there are two elements. The cardinality is 2. And so we have created the number 2. And number three? The method is the same, and then we put next to his three predecessors in all original. Do the same for the following units to infinity. Starting from scratch, and then out of nowhere, we have just recreated the set of all natural integers. And what is true for integers can also be used for all other families of numbers: rational, irrational, pure imaginary, all without exception, can be generated from zero. To infinity. The zero is a real number, imaginary numbers, however, represent an extension of real numbers. At zero scale of space-time there are still five, but only four dimensions: the four-dimensional space corresponding to the four sets of real numbers (integers, rational, irrational, and real-world). In fact, the fifth dimension (which brings with it the time) appears "after". Let us return to our four-dimensional bubble. When its radius is zero, it is nothing but the zero point. We must understand that this bill gives us the geometric image of the four families of real numbers. The call because of the bubble numbers. The bubble has a radius of the numbers zero and is reduced a simple point. This is the situation at the origin, when there is only zero. What happens from there? Something that is encoded in the same zero: the phenomenon affaascinante we've seen before and which generates, in a natural, all real numbers. So where to move the numbers? Obviously, in the four directions of the bubble and it generates four lines from the origin marked as zero. The expansion of the zero and the development of the four families of real numbers in four dimensions could then be compared to a "scaling" of the original bubble, we see a swell As the numbers grow. This change of scale, in fact, it is easy to be displayed, because it is simply the growth of the radius of the bubble in four dimensions. The Dirac delta function, has the particularity to be zero everywhere except at a point where it becomes infinite. The "area" covered by the graph of this function is a topological invariant of a 1. We turn to the conditions prevailing in the vicinity of the singularity: it is a point (and therefore occupies a space void) characterized by a "track", namely a topological invariant of a 1. It is possible that the singularity at the origin can be described simply by a delta function? This function has no support, that is nothing everywhere except on the singular point, where it becomes infinite for a moment zero. This brings us then to imagine the initial singularity as a "signal" of infinite extent. Point for construction, it propagates upwards in a range of real-time zero. In other words: the original point spreads upwards in imaginary time. Zero Point is a mathematical entity, information that can be entirely described by what we call "algebra". More specifically, the initial singularity is itself an algebra, von Neumann algebra, and algebra discovered by the great mathematician objects are essentially dynamic. It is this dynamic to make the original algebra, the first engine of the "Big Bang cold", the initial phase of expansion of the universe that occurred at time zero, before the Big Bang. Let's go back to zero: the digital image of the institution more mysterious is a simple point. By definition, this point is in a state which clearly defines the natural state of balance. " In this study it was shown that the state of equilibrium of a system is exactly equivalent (from a mathematical point of view) the evolution of that system in pure imaginary time. In other words, the equilibrium state of Ground Zero (which here represents the initial singularity) can be considered equivalently as its evolution in imaginary time (this development is defined "current in imaginary time" or "topological flow"). At zero scale, space-time was necessarily "in a state with a dynamic topological Euclidean." "Down", zero, there is an evolution governed by the delta function and that 'zero evolution "takes place only in imaginary time. In real time, the evolution of any system is described by an algebra in quantum mechanics is defined algebra of observables. In this research it was shown that there is another possible algebra, which has been called "algebra of states": it corresponds to the algebra of observables, but is calculated in imaginary time. The algebra of states describing the evolution of our system in imaginary time. This means that our point (which represents the initial singularity), instead of evolving in real time is subjected to a "change of scale" from zero to infinity in imaginary time. Since our zero-point can be represented as a bubble of size 4 and radius zero, its evolution in imaginary time is given in a natural way by the expansion radius from zero to infinity. Starting from the algebra of the initial states of the Zero Point, this evolution is governed, in depth, from what mathematicians call "flow of weights" of the algebra in question. The flow of weights (which also represent a current purely algebraic) is actually equivalent to the flow of evolution of the system in imaginary time. From a physical point of view and mathematical quest'inevitabile evolution in imaginary time can be conceived as what experts call the "expansion of the heat kernel. At zero scale, the starting point, the value of this nucleus is maximal: it is equal to 1. This "core heat "naturally tends to zero. The fall of the values \u200b\u200bof the heat kernel necessarily imply the expansion of space on which it is calculated, it will be clear that "cooling" to zero, the core of the heat causes the expansion (and therefore the change of scale) of the initial bubble void radius (which we had previously defined bubble of numbers). The singular point (corresponding to the vertex of the cone of light) is an object that defines the physical mathematical instanton zero length. The energy dell'istantone is imaginary. This unique "pseudo-particle is characterized by a kind of abstract charged that the experts called" charge topology and is invariant. One could compare this post to a quantity invariant information, such as that contained in a DVD, to borrow an example previously mentioned. At Ground Zero, there is a "potential topological" (described by the delta function), it propagates to infinity the topological charge dell'istantone initial zero length. Zero Point can thus be seen as an infinite number of instantons of zero size collected on a single point (a little 'as millions of books are now compacted into tiny grooves on a DVD). Similarly, a multitude of overlapping instantons are located at Zero Point, giving infinite wealth in terms of information. More precisely, the topological charge density, which increases with the number of instantons becomes infinite here. And here lies the secret topological expansion that preceded the physical expansion of the universe to find its ground state (corresponding to a density of topological charge at all), the radius dell'istantone must become infinite. Here too, we find again that "algebraic law" that pushes the zero to infinity. How can we conceive the birth of time? As the golden spiral of instantons takes place, new figures make their appearance, starting at 0, then 1, then 2, etc ... to infinity: the radius of the bubble changes, so that it grows and gives rise to a tremendous expansion. And infinity, the radius is infinitely large. Like soap bubbles of all sizes, the balls spread to infinity, driven solely by the dynamics of real numbers. Large or small, the bubbles are there, all at the same time, all equivalent. When the bubble grows and its radius becomes infinite, this means that its rim is infinitely removed from the center (the point representing the origin). Viewed from the edge, the center is so far from being disappeared by removing the center we have deleted in one fell swoop the entire interior of the bubble. This is because a bubble is what topology is defined as "connected space" and any point taken from the inside therefore has no scale can be "great" as the bubble itself. Accordingly, once removed the center of the bubble is only the edge, namely the three-dimensional sphere we call S3. The interior of the sphere does not exist anymore: it has become imaginary. As with the normal sphere S2 (a football) the interior was the third dimension of space, in the case of S3 we took the inside was nothing but the fourth dimension. Does this mean that the fourth spatial dimension of the bubble has become imaginary. But what is a dimension of space imaginary? Quite simply, is the size of real-time. Inside the bubble in four dimensions, the fourth dimension of space has been replaced by the only direction that could be "the bubble" without any space to occupy, the size of real-time. By removing our point on the radius of the bubble, it has turned on itself 90 degrees inside, making an imaginary straight line (the time, which we know is measured with imaginary numbers). From here onwards, the instantons (which are compact objects, which closed on themselves) disappear. Similarly, the symmetry group that governed them (the group SO (4), also a group Compact) "explodes", it loses its fundamental symmetry and suddenly opens up SO (3.1), ie the group of Lorentz symmetry, not compact, the group of space-time, what allows us, at any time, to measure the changes in real time. It is therefore by the 'explosion' of the Euclidean metric which arises Lorentzian metrics: one in which we remember the past and the desire of the future. Finally, remove the bubble numbers mean open it in a direction of time. It means, that is, bring it to no longer be static (closed in the direction of imaginary time), but make it dynamic (open in the direction of real time). When we remove a point in our bubble, it "changes of scale: the real-time begins to do its work and the numbers are added to the other without stopping. The result is that the bubble grows and we see the numbers grow, change of scale at every moment: the time is now born. The amazing phenomenon that has just been described thus shows how the infinite imaginary time, real time arises. And when the time is "open" that begins the famous "swing of the metric" between real time and imaginary time: time is the era of "complex" in which space-time evolves in five sizes, both real and imaginary time . You here, compared with zero to infinity, which is the phenomenon of "de compaction" of the time: the physics defines that moment, "Planck time" (or Planck time). Only at that moment begins the final stage: the imaginary time is gone, the imaginary energy is converted into real power and the "hot Big Bang" starts off. With it, began the expansion of the universe, that only happens in real time. This, then, the amazing power of zero, its fascinating mystery: deploy all the information it contains, in numerical strength. And if we suppose that the point of singularity is nothing but the image zero, then the representation of "geometric" of what we just saw the expansion has enabled us to assist cold, silent, original ball from zero to infinity. An expansion that, in view of what has just seen is not only natural is inevitable, inscribed itself in the existence of zero. This is the first secret of the Big Bang, the one that made the transition from zero to infinity screened on the Wall of Planck. A Big Bang cold and dark, thanks to which there was something out of nothing, through which the infinite has blossomed from zero. And being from nothing.

Thursday, August 26, 2010

Request Letter For Disconnect The Telephone Line





Resolution 166 outlines the guidelines for the allocation of the parking concession
very interesting

Where To Buy Costco Kirkland Makeup Brush Set

City Council City Council Resolution

clicking the page opens



Resolution 166 outlines the guidelines for the allocation parking concession
very interesting

Sunday, August 22, 2010

Melina Velba Lesbomovies

The Circle's Method to investigate the Goldbach's Conjecture and the Germain primes.

The Circle’s Method to investigate the Goldbach’s Conjecture and the Germain primes: Mathematical connections with the p-adic strings and the zeta strings.
(di Michele Nardelli e Rosario Turco - Agosto 2010)
Abstract

In this paper we have described in the Section 1 some equations and theorems concerning the Circle Method applied to the Goldbach’s Conjecture. In the Section 2 , we have described some equations and theorems concerning the Circle Method to investigate Germain primes by the Major arcs. In the Section 3 , we have described some equations concerning the equivalence between the Goldbach’s Conjecture and the Generalized Riemann Hypothesis. In the Section 4, We have Described Some equations Concerning the p-adic strings and the zeta strings. In conclusion, in the Section 5, We have possible Described Some Mathematical Connections Between the Various arguments discussed in the sections.
For the full article click on link:

How To Pick Up Gay Homeless Men

What was there before the Planck time? A possible Unified Theory Origin of the Universe and the unification of forces.

( from the book and Grishka Igor Bogdanov: "Before the Big Bang" - The Origin of the Universe - - Ed Longanesi - 2008 )

Part One

If we accept that the entire cosmos can be traced to a series of laws, constants, topological invariance, then you can take the same way the idea that the source itself Mathematics of the Universe has an essence. By this we mean that the underlying physical reality (the one we perceive with our senses) there is another reality: that the algebraic essence consists of information, contained information - encoded - at zero. Something that bears the image of an order, the highest of all currently known symmetries in physics. Already in 1998 the physicist John Wheeler said: "Today I adopted a new vision of the world, according to which everything is information." And maybe that's why the eyes of the physicist Neil Turok, one of the closest collaborators of the famous mathematician and physicist Stephen Hawking, "the entire universe has blossomed beautifully by a single formula." Just as there is a "genetic code" at the origin of living things, we could not imagine that there is a mathematical code "at the origin of the entire universe? The specialists of number theory have recently discovered the "numbers universe." It is transcendental numbers, endless, which contain all combinations conceivable figures. These mathematicians are almost certain that π is a number universe. It is possible that the entire universe is encoded in a single transcendental number? A "number universe"? If there is such a code, it is hidden in the zero. And if the universe around us (and to which we belong) makes sense, then it is because it contains within itself, from the outset, information is incredibly complex, non-physical essence that processes it, it directs and produces the . If the signature of space-time is subject to quantum fluctuations, then the unification of four forces occurs in the mathematical object that describes the fluctuation. To describe the universe before the Big Bang, and reaching the zero point, simply insert one extra dimension. is in this space that occurred in 5 dimensions, before the Big Bang, the very first stage of the universe: an expansion which is inscribed in the curve of a logarithmic spiral that mathematicians call the "golden spiral . The Singularity is not the most violent places in the universe. At Ground Zero, it all comes back surprisingly "quiet" quantum calms the storm, and with it the fluctuations of space and time. What emerges is a new reality, motionless, totally ordered, pure mathematics. And so we brought back all'invarianza topological entities mathematics very specifically to the origin of all that has been called "Index of Singularity." It shows us that Instant Zero is not available in real time, but in a new dimension which is defined in physics, imaginary time (ie a time that is measured with imaginary numbers). In the prehistory of the universe before the Big Bang, the signature of the metric has gone through a phase of primordial fluctuations and the Planck scale real-time changes in imaginary time. The number 4 seems to occupy a special place in nature. Fact, there are four - and only four - the physical forces in the universe. Similarly, there are only four fields and four stable particles in the world of atoms. From the point of view, simple arithmetic, there are in nature, in all respects, only four sets of numbers: the natural integers, rational numbers (ie fractions) and finally the irrational numbers (which, as the number π, are not complete and can not be written as a fraction). When combined, these three sets of numbers form a most complete family, called the real numbers. The image that we use to represent them is the most simple: a straight, continuous on every point which is called the real line and denoted by the letter R. But there is a fourth family is completely different from the other three: the of imaginary numbers. Their squares are negative real numbers and can also be represented by a straight line: the imaginary line, perpendicular to the real line. The two form the complex plane. The simplicity of the size of the planet rests on this: with the three families of real numbers we get the three directions of space, with the family of imaginary numbers here that we have the time (remember that Poincaré showed that we can actually measure the time only using imaginary numbers). The set of real numbers is made by the union of three sets: the integers, the rational and the irrational. It is thus four different sets of real numbers: if you add the pure imaginary, we have five basic sets of numbers. From a physical point of view was discovered there at the Planck scale - in addition to the dimension of time - a new dimension, a fourth dimension of space, of infinite length, resulting from the rotation of the coordinate of time on its axis (this rotation is known in physics Wick rotation). What was discovered is that, because of the enormous quantum fluctuations applied to the existing curvature Planck time, the direction at that time not so long ago was still stable but fluctuated (swinging, turning on itself) in one direction new, a fifth dimension. This reaffirms once again that space-time primordial at the Planck scale consisted of three life-size (ordinary physical space) and other two dimensions (the real-time and imaginary time) together in one complex dimension (the complex time ). We find this same building with the numbers, because the three basic sets of real numbers (integers, rational and irrational) are, strictly speaking, also supplemented by the real and pure imaginary united in so-called complex numbers, which are the numbers who, alone, can afford to "measure" the time when waves, ie when it becomes complex. To conclude, combining the five basic sets of which we have just discussed, we get what mathematicians consider today the most beautiful math equation of all: it is the Euler formula: e ^ iπ + 1 = 0. According to the famous American physicist Richard Feynmann is "the most remarkable formula in all mathematics." Its strength is that it brings together in a unique, ideal, the five fundamental mathematical constants of the universe, and the five-dimensional space of numbers. What shape is the universe? The hypothesis of this research led to that of a sphere in three dimensions (the interior put into effect the fourth dimension). The topology of space-time must necessarily be finite and spherical. Hence the conclusion is easy to grasp: we live in (and not "above") the three-dimensional surface of the sphere. The cosmic expansion can be conceived as the swelling of this sphere in three dimensions (which is not so much that the edge of space-time) along a cone in three dimensions, too: the famous "light cone" proposed by Einstein. The temporal direction, perpendicular to the surface, then is necessarily inside the sphere, which represents the radius, a radius that increases each time due to expansion. If the scale of Planck time becomes unstable (ie "floating") the cause is the action of an energy, an elemental force (actually, a scalar field, which in physics is called "dilaton"). Today, however, this "dark energy" is the trace of that elusive primordial field, near the origin, did fluctuate over time. It is interesting to note the following "coincidences". The volume of the Universe is equal to 10 to the eightieth = (10 ^ 40) ^ 2 m ^ 3. The same figure was found when measuring the number of elementary particles that make up the entire cosmos: the eightieth 10 = (10 ^ 40) ^ 2. The total mass of the universe is about 10 ^ 40 tons. The cosmological horizon is 14 billion light-years, ie 10 ^ 40 times the radius of the proton. The intensity ratio between the electromagnetic force and the force of gravity is still 10 ^ 40. Finally, the age of the universe: 10 ^ 40 times as long as a ray of light takes to cross a proton. Dirac and Eddington were nothing short of "baffled" by using the number "dimensionless" 10 ^ 40! The gravity affects the passage of time. Lorentz and Einstein showed that when the velocity of an object - and therefore its gravitational potential - increases, its time slows down. If we accept that in a quantum speed of objects may exceed the threshold of light, then the direction of time becomes imaginary (which would inevitably change the scoring and leads to the possibility fluctuation). Just as the space curve, severity "curve" time too. And the Planck scale, its action is so strong that the contract on a real-time, until it becomes, the scale zero, pure imaginary. At the Planck scale, the sample size on which rests our reality begins to "float" and to deform before breaking up, at random, in a huge flux quantum. What does that mean exactly the phrase, the metric fluctuates at the Planck scale? Simply, that 15 billion years ago, at the Planck length, the metric that can measure the distance between two points is no longer fixed. At the Planck time, nothing is more stable. If the infinitely small, the metric fluctuates, because its main characteristic, namely the so-called signature, is expected to remain fixed? Given the fluctuation of curvature of the universe being born, at that time also the primordial signature floated. This means that near the beginning, time was not yet established but it was moving: vague, indefinite and fluctuating. Faced with these unpredictable temporal shifts, we must admit that as long as we know it - the real-time - can suddenly turn into something else and become imaginary. The direction of imaginary time is similar to the other three directions of space already exist. During these phenomenal quantum fluctuations, the time is thus transformed into a space before you change again and become again the dimension of time. These incredible events have thus verified the Planck time, about 14 billion years ago. Poincaré showed that the early twentieth century when the usual time (physical time real) rotates 90 ° in the complex, becomes "pure imagination". We can therefore understand that the imaginary time and space are very similar. In this case, the sign "-" which is usually found in front of the time coordinate becomes "+". The signature takes the form of "Euclidean" characterized by four directions of space (++++). This is precisely the Euclidean metric we use to describe the scale zero, the initial singularity of spacetime. To describe these events must use entirely new mathematical tools: the "quantum groups", Algebraic extraordinary institutions since 1986, have made their appearance in the family of "deformed algebras. Why should I use this algebraic deformations? For a simple basic reason: the approach of the initial singularity of space-time structures are themselves profoundly changed - deformed - by the enormous gravitational field that surrounds the source. Let's see what a group of symmetry. Take a normal ball and let's turn on itself: this rotation is not "deform" the ball. In mathematical language, it is said then that its symmetry is preserved under the action of the rotation group. This symmetry group is the so-called three-dimensional Lie group and we write SO (3), ie "orthogonal symmetry of dimension 3. Now, we add time to our ordinary space in three dimensions. Thus there is a dimension. The new symmetry group, one that preserves the symmetries not only in space but in space-time, do not you write more then SO (3) but SO (3,1), where 3 refers to three directions of space and a direction of time. This group, the Lorentz group, clearly distinguishes the three directions of space from that time. Any transformation that preserves the time-space orientation between the space and time. If we rotate the ball on himself, not only it does not deform (rotational symmetry), but preserves, too, the distinction between the space occupied by the balloon and the time in which it "lives". Although it continues to turn in on itself, our ball does not jump an hour (or second) in the future (or past). At the Planck scale, everything starts to float. Large space-time symmetries are therefore more conservative. Deforming, ie bringing quantum scale, the Lorentz group, that is, if you make the "quantum" the group that describes space-time, then the distinction between time and space has ceased and ends with the disappearance. We say in more precise terms that the Lorentz group SO (3.1) once "deformed" begins to look like a new group of symmetry, which is no longer any difference between time and space: it is the "group Euclidean, "you write SO (4), where 4 indicates the four directions of space. There is therefore a "q-deformation" ("q" stands for quantum) of Lorentzian signature at the Planck scale. In the four-dimensional spacetime, the only natural as possible signatures at the Planck scale are the Lorentzian signature (+ + + -) and Euclidian (++++). The only possible metric at the Planck scale is reduced in all respects to two families: the Lorentzian metrics in real time and the Euclidean metric in imaginary time. The reasoning of the research up to this point, is constructed in three phases. Half time: space-time at the Planck scale is "warped" by the quantum fluctuations which have been referred to the scale. Second: in this case, the main feature of this space-time, namely the metric (which is used to measure the distance between points), is also "distorted" and waves. Third time: if the metric fluctuates, then its main property (the so-called signature, which distinguishes time from space) must necessarily fluctuate in turn. In its primitive phase, the universe must have been rising globally, "in thermal equilibrium." If the Planck scale the pre-space-time was in balance, then had to be located in a very special physical state, called the "state of KMS (Kubo, Martin, Schwinger)": a condition that dominated the early moments of the universe emerging . What is the status of KMS? The KMS condition is fundamental in quantum theory. It allows to fully characterize the equilibrium states thermal system. The KMS condition establishes a relationship between the natural evolution of the time - which is subject to the Lorentzian metric (+ + + -) - and the state of equilibrium, which is subject to the Euclidean metric (++++). And this brings us to a very simple metric "overlay" (+++±), ie to a time that involves a complex real direction and one direction purely imaginary. The KMS condition is simply this: Through the relationship established between equilibrium and evolution of the system necessarily leads to a complex time, the same that ruled the "world" at the Planck scale. The idea introduced unconventional in theory we are describing, is that at high temperatures the system of Yang-Mills wave suppressed in the fourth dimension, assuming a value of either kind of time and / or gender space. In other words, the surface three-dimensional space is thus two possible extensions within which there is a fluctuation: the usual physical space-time Lorentz (3 +1) dimensions with a floating four-dimensional Euclidean space. Regarding the idea of \u200b\u200bthe fifth dimension, as it should be noted in December 1999 was published an article signed memorable by theoretical physicists Lisa Randall and Raman Sundrum, which is evidence that our three-dimensional space is surrounded by five dimensions. In this thesis, There are four spatial dimensions and one time dimension that we can perceive, but there is also an extra spatial dimension, which we do not perceive. According to this model, in our space-time there is a fifth dimension, a dimension of infinite space in which gravity propagates (which explains, inter alia, because the force of gravity is much weaker than the other three forces of 'universe). The Randall-Sundrum theory is based strictly on the same idea of \u200b\u200bthe thesis that we are dealing with: that of a fifth dimension that ensures the unity of our world. If there were really that size would allow to understand the phenomena so far unexplained, for example the huge difference between gravity and the other three. Or the mysterious "tunnel effect", ie "instant jump", without any transition, the particles from one point in spacetime. A fifth dimension leads directly into a new type of Big Bang, Big Bang a cold that took place before the Board of Planck, and so before the hot Big Bang as we know it. Why cold? Because it describes the first phase of expansion that is not physical, that did not take place in real time but in time: a phenomenon which necessarily implies the existence of an extra dimension (that of imaginary time). Result? The cosmos "before" the Big Bang has four, but five dimensions. The KMS condition ideally realizes the transition, the transition between the information contained in a system (in the pure state of equilibrium) energy of this same system. The one - information - evolve in purely imaginary time while the other - the energy - evolve in real time. And both are unified within the KMS condition. But of course, in this case, the evolution of pre-quantum space-time scale to be considered is characterized by the transfer information and energy. And the fluctuation of the signature appears to be the very thing that makes this incredible transfer. In the case corresponding to zero-scale (where the KMS states are having a track) need to be a factor of type II, which is entirely correct. Consequently, the zero-scale, space-time is a topological state and its "dynamic" is Euclidean. It must therefore be concluded that the evolution of the universe at time zero (the Big Bang cold) are held in imaginary time, not in real time. Is the Planck time, at this moment unthinkable 10 ^ -43 seconds after time 0, which makes its appearance in the physical universe. Physicists are able to track up to 10 ^ -43 seconds, and no further. Here are confronted with the so-called "Planck's Wall." Obstacles? First, the wall temperature: 10 ^ 32 degrees. According to the wall: that of energy, equal to 10 ^ 19 gigaelettronvolt. In the 10 ^ 19 GeV is so colossal energy: the energy of the entire universe. This energy has immense curved universe at the beginning of everything, like a huge iron bar bent, twisted, pressed up to the Planck length (10 ^ -33 cm). At a time when the universe was compressed to the size of a centimeter cube weighing over 10 ^ 75 tonnes. And here we are looking to the third wall, the infinitely small: 10 ^ -33 cm. At the time of Planck's Wall, the ordinary time has just begun, and every tiny village of second, there would seem long billions of years of "our" time. Why is the Planck time, compared to a second, is a billion billion billion times smaller than is the duration of a flash from the entire history of the universe. In other words, the time in a universe dominated by cyclical fluctuations would seem endless. For example, if we measure one nanometer, or one billionth of a meter, a second would take our over thirty years. At a thousandth of a nanometer, the duration of a second would be thirty thousand years. And the size of a hydrogen atom, the same stretch in the second one to over thirty million years. It is therefore clear that a billion orders of magnitude lower, ie at the Planck scale, time seems to literally immobile. As is minuscule, the Planck wall still surrounds the entire universe. From a height of 10 ^ -33 cm, everywhere in the cosmos, we find him. If the "wall" is ubiquitous despite its smallness, it is because it is built with the three fundamental constants of nature: the gravitational constant, the speed of light and Planck's constant (the tiny "grain" of energy possible.) The formula is as follows: the square of the Planck length is equal to the product of the gravitational constant for the Planck's constant divided by the cube of the speed of light. The era of Planck is based on exactly the same formula, the only difference being that the speed of light is not high, but the cube to the fifth power. When we reach the unimaginable length of 10 ^ -33 cm, the fabric of space-time tears and becomes discontinuous: those who are mathematicians, physicists call the "vanishing cycles. At the moment they are born, the universe has an age equal to a tiny fraction of a second (10 ^ -43 seconds) and, similarly, has nonzero size (10 ^ -33 cm). At that moment, therefore, the horizon radius around any point boundary the maximum proportion of the visible universe by an observer. In this case, this radius is necessarily equal to the Planck length (10 ^ -33 cm), distance traveled by light during the Planck time (10 ^ -43 seconds). And since the radius of the horizon must of course be the same in all directions, the space is an observable three-dimensional sphere whose volume is equal to roughly π multiplied by 10 ^ -99 cubic centimeters. It is what is called "Planck volume." At the time of its birth, the universe - which is only pure energy - weighs 22 micrograms, then the sphere of Planck weighs 22 micrograms. The ball is very "solid": is a bubble of primitive energy of 10 ^ 19 gigaelettronvolt, the Planck energy. And his "resistance" is equal to what we call the Planck force, ie 10 ^ 40 tons. Evidently, a lot of incredible strength corresponds to vibrational frequency that is called the Planck frequency: 10 ^ 43 hertz. When the radius of the universe is equal to the distance of Planck, the four forces are merged into one. At this scale the universe is in an extraordinary state: the state of KMS, and it was amazing the weather fluctuates between real time and imaginary time. This has an important consequence: it becomes possible to realize the unification of the four forces of the universe. The unification achieved between the metrics in real time and imaginary time metrics contains exactly the symmetry of external (gravity), and the three internal symmetries (electromagnetism, strong force and weak force). This state bears the image of another symmetry, even more profound as its predecessor: a symmetry between the energy content of spacetime and its contents into information. KMS must therefore interpret the state as a transition between the encoded information to the zero-scale energy that appears at the Planck scale. The sphere is a sphere of Planck dimensions to three, whose interior is deformed continuously. The sphere is a "hypersphere" whose surface is in contact with the so-called "Elsewhere" of general relativity, ovverossia nothing. Outside the sphere, the space-time does not exist. To find "something" we must go inside dell'ipersuperficie, which has three dimensions: that we highlight in its surface. This surface has a thickness: these are the three dimensions of ordinary space. Its volume is 2π ^ 2R ^ 3. At the Planck scale, the volume of the surface of the 3-sphere of Planck is the order of 10 ^ -99 cubic centimeters. We can then "walk" everywhere on the surface of the sphere, but we can never go into it: it boils down to a "hybrid" between the Lorentzian and Euclidean geometry. Planck's Wall is subject to the forces of quantum fluctuation. This means that the direction of time in the ball swinging, floating, between the temporal direction and a fourth spatial direction. Why are these phenomena? Because just like matter and energy, space and time themselves come to be subject to the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. According to this principle, it is impossible, in the infinitely small, simultaneously determine the position of a particle in space and its speed. There is therefore, around any quantum event, a sort of irreducible blur. At this scale, originating in the universe takes the form of a seething ocean, continually crossed by random disturbances, spikes and distortions such that the usual notions of high and low, right and left, before and after mix , break up and end up losing all meaning. In this area of \u200b\u200bPlanck, the photons are inextricably linked to other particles, especially those of the gravitational fields (called gravitons). We notice immediately that the ordinary particles do not exist anymore. In their place, perhaps we could perceive those strands that cross the hypersurface from side to side, the so-called strings of the Planck length, in perpetual vibration. These strings appear, intersect and disappear suddenly hidden by countless blacks holes in the membrane is chaotically scattered primitive. In the space where we are, we can see changes in scale, abrupt and unforeseeable, caused by the oscillation of the metric. The "substance" of this early universe, the membrane, using an expression adopted in string theory, is made up of objects that express only the geometry of the universe baby. This geometry is itself conditioned by the metric, which is the "brick" used to build the universe in Planck time. There is still nothing, except the four forces merged. Only by accepting a change of metric becomes possible to understand what happens to the quantum scale. Because the Planck scale, two phenomena strongly disturb this metric: the first is the enormous gravity, and the second one is the famous uncertainty principle that puts everything that exists there. The results "relativistic" of such research at the Planck scale - including support before a jury of string theorists - materialize an unexpected link between the curvature of space-time and the signature of the metric. When the curvature is low, that is, when spacetime is almost flat, the goal the metric is simply divided among three "+" signs for the spatial coordinates, and a "-" for the coordinate of time. At the Planck scale curvature becomes huge: the intense curvature distorts even time. At the Planck curvature, the metric becomes Euclidean - in other words, time becomes pure imaginary. We start from the Lorentz formula, whereby the velocity of a moving body increases, its relative time slows down. When this speed reaches (ideally) of light, time on the moving body freezes completely: the time has stopped "flow". What happens when the speed exceeds the limit of light? The weather on the body becomes pure imaginary. This calculation is based on the hypothesis of tachyons, hypothetical particles of physics that will always travel faster than light. At the Planck scale the speed of light, because of quantum fluctuations, from one point in the nascent universe, sometimes fluctuates below and sometimes even far above, "our" speed of light. The consequences are absolutely inevitable: the weather around this region becomes pure imaginary, and hence the metric becomes Euclidean. At this scale, the cone of light is itself subject to quantum fluctuations which deform the shell. "Beyond below "the Planck scale the cone begins to evaporate. This means that the speed of light waves. As a result, locally, from one point to another, the metric can oscillate and become Euclidean. The "wall" that we could also call the Planck horizon, between the world before the Big Bang from the rest of the universe. Going beyond this horizon, we began to feel distinctly fluctuations gradually stronger than the fabric of space-time. In particular, subiremmo repulsive effects of the tide. Indeed, the initial singularity is what mathematics is called "repulsive point, far from dismissing it not only energy, but the very structure of space. When we reach the Planck scale, space dissolves into a sort of "quantum foam." The findings on the "float time" begin to tell us what is in that void, something that could be likened to a sort of "wild ocean." At this scale, the quantum deep ocean is huge: the bottom (ie the scale 0) is at a distance, as it's over, it seems in a sense infinite trillions of light years. The interesting thing is that the expansion that you can go from zero-scale at the Planck scale is logarithmic. In other words, the universe's expansion before the Big Bang follows a logarithmic spiral in which mathematics is called the "golden spiral . It is also interesting to note that 43, then the exponent of the "Planck time" 10 ^ -43, is the sum of the following powers of phi: 0.2229 + 7.8541 + 10.4721 + 12.7082 + 11 7446 = 43 ≈ 43.0019. (In fact, if we approximate to two decimal places we get: 0.22 + 7.85 + 10:47 + 11.75 + 12.71 = 43). Mathematicians have shown that even if an infinite number of times we turned around at Ground Zero, the distance traveled is over. This explains that even though the Ground Zero seems to be at an infinite distance from the "Wall of Planck", you can still reach it. The ocean is a quantum unstable environment in five dimensions: the size of the fluctuations of the extra picks fourth coordinate, which becomes alternately coordinated gender space and / or gender time. This "ocean" in five dimensions is made of the primordial substance that dominated at the time of Planck metrics free, extreme support of space and time. What are these metrics? In fact, we must see them as "atoms" metrics are "atoms" of space or time. There are only two classes: first, the "monopolies" (magnetic or gravitational charges which have not two, but only one pole) that are in the space-time and whose signature is (+ + + -), but also so-called "instantons", whose signature is Euclidean (++++). Contrary to monopolies, which have an energy, instantons contain only "information". They are compact (closed), with high symmetry and totally static. The information that is contained in the one carrying the mathematical physics called "topological charge". You meet them only in the elsewhere (ie, on the other side of the cone of light). It was noted that there exists in 4 dimensions, a relation of "duality" between monopoles and instantons. Close to the Wall Planck, is to dominate the action (or energy) of monopolies, time "flows" and it is real. In contrast, around Ground Zero, to get the better is the action of the Euclidean instanton, time ceases to flow and becomes imaginary. The more we go in depth in the 'quantum ocean, most of the space metric becomes "agitated." Due to the fluctuations of the curvature of space primal, monopolies become instantons before returning to be monopolies, the metric starts to fluctuate between two configurations. Then, as we move toward the "abyss", the vortices (eddies) are more quantum impressive: halfway between the surface (the Planck scale) and bottom (scale zero), very violent fluctuations open immense gravitational quantum vortices in the ocean, in which "collapse" instantons and monopoles in a swirling current that oscillates between energy and information. In the middle of this frightening "storm" primordial waves degenerate metrics go into space to mix monopolies and instantons in a "quantum foam" in which information becomes energy. This remarkable passage between information and energy is paramount, after all, linked to the transformation of the imaginary time in real time. All this took place far away in the age when the universe was undergoing primal in its entirety, the supersymmetry of the KMS condition. There, in the heart of the ocean quantum instantons and monopoles were equal numbers of Lorentzian and Euclidean metrics were completely overlapping. This area of \u200b\u200boverlap was a complex space in five dimensions, whose fourth coordinate (depending on the fluctuations of the curvature) was transformed either in real time (Lorentz) and / or pure imaginary time (Euclidean). There was therefore a time when the flashes of energy were nothing but clouds of information. Then gradually that it is pushed towards zero, towards the bottom end of our ocean, the fluctuations gradually lose intensity. Gradually, the instantons become more stable, they cease to become monopolies so that, when finally we get to the bottom, there is only a few rare monopole: the Euclidean instantons dominate the entire landscape. And here, when we finally zero in view of the scale, we discover something amazing: all instantons converge in a spiral (gold) to the Zero Point where they overlap, mingle and merge into a single instanton in four dimensions: ' singular gravitational instanton of zero size. What theoretical physicists call "topological charge density, for quell'istantone zero length is infinite. That configuration primordial at the same time infinitely simple and infinitely complex itself contains all the information of the entire universe, from zero to infinity. This is a purely topological object, which lives off the real time and which encompasses the entire evolution of the universe in imaginary time. These instantons have the form of a "ball" in four dimensions whose boundary consists of a sphere in three dimensions. In recent years, especially under the leadership of S. Hawking has been developed the model of "gravitational instantons", in which the force field considered is the supergravity (connected to string theory and M-Theory). This is the type of instanton which is considered in this research, namely instantons that could be implicated in the vicinity of the initial singularity of spacetime, when the intensity of gravity was equivalent to that of the other three forces of the universe. The gravitational instantons can also be defined by their action. It comes in the form of a sum which he sees as addenda to the integral part (calculated in a four-dimensional space) of the square of the curvature of space-time pre-and on the other hand, what we call "topological charge configuration "(which, by definition, is an invariant). The first term, for which construction is finished, so far hence the intensity of the 'tunnel effect "characterizing the instanton. The instanton solution can be seen as a trajectory tunnel between two states of zero energy, separated by a barrier. In this sense, a gravitational instanton can instantly connect two points in space-time far away from each other, whatever their distance. The tunnel effect is very large (ie maximum) near the initial singularity, where the barrier between two points is at its maximum height because of the phenomenal amount of curvature. Then decreases as they are considered space-time scales of progressively larger (and thus less curvature strong), becoming practically nothing to the ordinary scales that characterize the world today (ie in flat spacetime). The second term, unlike the first, is independent of the spatial and temporal scales. This is the topological charge dell'istantone, which is related to the product of the curvature of space-time to its dual. It represents a global property of the configuration, completely independent of the scale (ie the size dell'istantone). This means that the topological charge is preserved throughout, even when the instanton reaches a zero length.